Introduction:
This topic is something I am still working out the logistics of in my head. As such this Stance is surely to change over time, but I will list changes made in the comments section.
A large part of Church Authority is the proper usage of Church Discipline as discussed by Christ in Matthew 18:15-20. Authority always has to have some negative consequences for going against their authority. A coercive government has as their final consequence death. A place of employment will have their job terminated as a final consequence. A marriage might end in divorce or separation if you don't believe in divorce. It is that final, negative consequence compared with the benefits of submission that will keep someone following "orders" and doing what they might not always be inclined to do.
Stance Summary:
I firmly believe (though like I said I am still working out the logistics) that the Church should take a bigger role in arbitration and law amongst those who call themselves Christians. We are told that excommunication should be the final negative consequence of not following God's Laws. We are commanded not to take fellow believers to secular courts. Now, it is really just the application of these that needs to be worked out.
Personal Actions Based on Stance:
I have studied and continue to study the theoretical approach to, the history of, and the application of private legal services. I am to make a contribution somehow, someway in expanding this into the Church.
Expansion:
Sources:
Church Discipline: Matthew 18:15-20 - Link
Taking Christians to secular Courts: 1st Corinthians 6:1-7 - Link
Closing:
"But his delight is in the law of the Lord, and in His law he meditates day and night." -- Psalm 1:2
"This sharing in the Eternal Law by intelligent creatures is called natural law." -- Thomas Aquinas
Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts
Sunday, October 10, 2010
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Turn the Other Cheek
Introduction:
Stance Summary:
I agree with Lewis on this one, there are times where we have to use violence in order to follow the other commandments and live out our life. Even Christ used aggression when cleaning the temple of the people who tainted it. Like Lewis says in the same address, if it's between you and another person, be the better man and let him be. But as soon as another person enters it, the whole paradigm changes. As I say on my facebook page:
Personal Actions Based on Stance:
Expansion:
Sources:
Closing:
You have heard that it was said, 'An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.' But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.Matthew 5:38-42, NIV
Stance Summary:
I think the text means exactly what it says, but with an understood reservation in favour of those obviously exceptional cases which every hearer would naturally assume to be exceptions without being told.CS Lewis (1940, The Weight of Glory - Why I am not a Pacifist)
I agree with Lewis on this one, there are times where we have to use violence in order to follow the other commandments and live out our life. Even Christ used aggression when cleaning the temple of the people who tainted it. Like Lewis says in the same address, if it's between you and another person, be the better man and let him be. But as soon as another person enters it, the whole paradigm changes. As I say on my facebook page:
Course, I'm no pacifist, the moment you use force to get something from someone else, I'll be all over you like I was all over that spider and flying bug thing earlier today. ... They got the shoe to the face technique, just so you know.
Personal Actions Based on Stance:
Expansion:
Sources:
Closing:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)