Church Authority

Introduction:
This topic is something I am still working out the logistics of in my head.  As such this Stance is surely to change over time, but I will list changes made in the comments section.

A large part of Church Authority is the proper usage of Church Discipline as discussed by Christ in Matthew 18:15-20.  Authority always has to have some negative consequences for going against their authority.  A coercive government has as their final consequence death.  A place of employment will have their job terminated as a final consequence.  A marriage might end in divorce or separation if you don't believe in divorce.  It is that final, negative consequence compared with the benefits of submission that will keep someone following "orders" and doing what they might not always be inclined to do. 

Stance Summary:
I firmly believe (though like I said I am still working out the logistics) that the Church should take a bigger role in arbitration and law amongst those who call themselves Christians.  We are told that excommunication should be the final negative consequence of not following God's Laws.  We are commanded not to take fellow believers to secular courts.  Now, it is really just the application of these that needs to be worked out. 

Personal Actions Based on Stance:
I have studied and continue to study the theoretical approach to, the history of, and the application of private legal services.  I am to make a contribution somehow, someway in expanding this into the Church.

Expansion:

Sources:
Church Discipline: Matthew 18:15-20 - Link
Taking Christians to secular Courts: 1st Corinthians 6:1-7 - Link


Closing: